RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Financial Development & Growth, as of June 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Financial Development & Growth, these are 99 authors affiliated with 471 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Financial Development & Growth

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-FDG (Financial Development & Growth).
RankScoreInstitution
12.26Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(1)2.26Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
22.65International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
(3)2.67Stanford Center for International Development (SCID), Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
22.67Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
45.64World Bank Group, Washington
55.71Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
67.5Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
(7)7.63Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
710.46Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
812.69Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
913.15Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca
(10)15.9Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
1015.98Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1117.56Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1219.01Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1319.06Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
1419.91Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
(15)21.65Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1522.56Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington
1623.42Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1724.07Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
(17)24.07Global Economics & Management Group, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1825.39Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill
1925.85Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
2026.27Brookings Institution, Washington
(21)28.52Global Economy and Development Program, Brookings Institution, Washington
2131.62Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
2231.88National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
2333.21Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

Top 5% authors in the field of Financial Development & Growth

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.05John B. Taylor
2.2.52Eswar Prasad
3.3.95Ayhan Kose
4.4.43Ramon Lopez

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.