Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.03 | Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago |
2 | 4.61 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
3 | 5.29 | Economics Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing |
4 | 5.7 | International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington |
5 | 5.74 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
6 | 8 | Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris |
(7) | 8.22 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
7 | 8.58 | Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill |
8 | 9.17 | Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge |
9 | 10.45 | Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg |
10 | 12.05 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Davis, Davis |
11 | 12.08 | London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London |
12 | 13.05 | Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston |
13 | 14.56 | Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, State College |
14 | 15.23 | Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
15 | 16.11 | Economics Department, Brown University, Providence |
16 | 17.79 | Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros (CEMFI), Madrid |
17 | 18.8 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
18 | 19.08 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge |
19 | 20.31 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
20 | 20.9 | Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin |
21 | 21.08 | Department of Economics, State University of New York-Binghamton (SUNY), Binghamton |
22 | 21.58 | Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
(23) | 22.2 | Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London |
23 | 22.73 | Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
24 | 22.76 | School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane |
25 | 23.83 | World Bank Group, Washington |
26 | 24.04 | Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto |
(27) | 27.62 | Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
27 | 27.91 | Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen |
(28) | 30.97 | Economics Department, Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris |
28 | 33.24 | Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry |
29 | 33.89 | Statistics Canada, Government of Canada, Ottawa |
30 | 34.34 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
31 | 34.86 | Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
32 | 35.41 | Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE), Government of France, Paris |
(32) | 35.41 | Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique (CREST), Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE), Government of France, Paris |
(33) | 36.11 | Department of Economics, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe |
32 | 36.11 | College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe |
(34) | 37.33 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
34 | 37.7 | Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles |
35 | 38.91 | Business School, Imperial College, London |
(36) | 40.91 | Groningen Growth and Development Centre (GGDC), Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen |
(36) | 41.13 | Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane |
36 | 41.76 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
37 | 42.23 | Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
38 | 42.26 | London Business School (LBS), University of London, London |
39 | 44.49 | Department of Economics, Florida International University, Miami |
40 | 45.95 | Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot |
41 | 45.98 | ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles |
42 | 46.47 | Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington |
43 | 46.83 | Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis |
(43) | 46.83 | Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis |
44 | 46.94 | Facultade de Ciencias Económicas e Empresariais, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela |
(45) | 48.14 | Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve |
(45) | 54.05 | Center for Economic Studies, Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington |
(44) | 54.05 | Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington |
45 | 54.17 | Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City |
46 | 55.3 | Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor |
47 | 55.5 | DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin |
48 | 55.53 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
(49) | 56.28 | Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
48 | 56.28 | Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
50 | 56.57 | Department of Economics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow |
51 | 56.89 | Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London |
(52) | 57.19 | Econometria, Facultade de Ciencias Económicas e Empresariais, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela |
52 | 62.68 | Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão (ISEG), Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa |
53 | 62.97 | Department of Economics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits: