RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Computational Economics, as of June 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Computational Economics, these are 454 authors affiliated with 919 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Computational Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CMP (Computational Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.03Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
22.95Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
33.29Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
44.98Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
55.73Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
(6)6.85Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
67.3Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
77.91Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
89.39Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
911.31Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
1011.53Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
1112.08Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
1212.25Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
1313.74Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
1415.02Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(15)15.31Centre of Policy Studies and Impact Project (COPS), Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
1517.71Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames
1617.77School of Finance and Economics, University of Technology, Sydney
1718.81Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
1819.09Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1921.52Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2023.68Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2125.48CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg (Katholieke Universiteit Brabant), Tilburg
2226.53Economics Department, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
(23)27.1Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2327.56Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham
2428.4Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
2530.33Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
2630.54Department of Economics, University of Texas-Austin, Austin
2731.67International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
2832.3Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
2933.22Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3034.33ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
3134.38School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
3235.1Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
3336.53Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
3438.4World Bank Group, Washington
3539.55Department of Economics, State University of New York-Buffalo (SUNY), Buffalo
3640.59Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
3743.86Economics Department, State University of New York-Oswego (SUNY), Oswego
3844.63Economics Program, National Science Foundation, Government of the United States, Washington
3945.93Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
4047.64Economics Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing
4147.83Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
4248.63Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
4350.4Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville
4451.1Utrecht School of Economics, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht
4551.68Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby

Top 5% authors in the field of Computational Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.39Christopher Sims
2.2.05Peter Nijkamp
3.5.37David W. Wilcox
4.5.79Alan V. Deardorff
5.5.83Richard S.J. Tol
6.6.49Erik Brynjolfsson
7.6.91Margaret Emily Slade
8.8.27Leigh S Tesfatsion
9.9.33David Andrew Kendrick
10.10Edward C. Norton
11.13.45William L. Goffe
12.13.52Andrew Feltenstein
13.14.49John Whalley
14.14.98Juan F Rubio-Ramirez
15.16.08Peter Bishop Dixon
16.16.21Hans M Amman
17.17.21Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde
18.17.24Angelo Melino
19.17.36Blake Lebaron
20.18.34Jack P.C. Kleijnen
21.18.37Jasmina Arifovic
22.19.94Paul Contoyannis

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.