RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Economics of Ageing, as of June 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Economics of Ageing, these are 171 authors affiliated with 452 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Economics of Ageing

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-AGE (Economics of Ageing).
RankScoreInstitution
11.07RAND, Santa Monica
22.95Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
33.1Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
43.87Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
53.92Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge
65.84Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
78.96Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
88.99Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
99.72Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
1011.23National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
1111.87Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis
1213.77Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(13)14.57Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (ELS), Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
(13)14.67Labor and Population Program, RAND, Santa Monica
1316.26Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
1417.89Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(14)17.89Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1518.48Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
(16)20.14ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP), Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1620.21Economics Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover
1720.43Center for Retirement Research (CRR), Boston College, Chestnut Hill
1823.53Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1923.7Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
2023.99Urban Institute, Washington
2126.18International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
(22)28.06Finance Department, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
2128.06Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City

Top 5% authors in the field of Economics of Ageing

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.2.14David Bloom
2.2.57Michael D. Hurd
3.2.64Robert J. Willis
4.3.03David Canning
5.4.32Neil Bruce
6.8.16Timothy Aaron Waidmann
7.8.2Edward Whitehouse
8.9.72Arie Kapteyn

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.