Field Rankings at IDEAS: Technology & Industrial Dynamics

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Technology & Industrial Dynamics, as of May 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Technology & Industrial Dynamics, these are 448 authors affiliated with 901 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Technology & Industrial Dynamics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-TID (Technology & Industrial Dynamics).

Rank	Score	Institution
1	1.03	Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
2	2.55	Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3	5.31	Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
4	6.3	London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(5)	6.51	Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
4	6.51	Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
6	7.9	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
7	8.17	Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
8	8.26	International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham
(9)	10.43	Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
9	11.9	Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
10	11.91	Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
11	13.66	School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
12	14.36	Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
13	15.57	Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
14	15.6	Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
15	16.61	National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
16	17.07	Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies (KITeS/CESPRI), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milano
17	18.67	United Nations University-Maastricht Economic Research Institute of Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT), Maastricht
18	19.17	Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
19	19.18	Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
(20)	19.38	Economics Department, London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
20	20.8	Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
21	21.08	Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
22	21.61	Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
23	22.09	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht
24	24.81	Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
25	26.18	Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
26	26.69	Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
27	26.8	Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
28	26.85	Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
29	27.1	Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
30	27.92	Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
31	29.5	Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
(32)	31.75	Management Department, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
32	32.7	Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(33)	33.85	Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
33	35.86	Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
34	38.5	Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa
(35)	38.61	Economic Analysis & Policy Group (EAP), Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(35)	40.22	Finance Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
35	40.29	Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
36	43.69	Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
37	43.73	Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
38	44.07	Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
(39)	45.06	Strategy and Business Economics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
39	45.92	Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa
40	46.14	Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
(41)	47.29	Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(41)	49.3	Vakgroep Algemene Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht
41	49.97	Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill
42	50.13	Department of Economics, Florida International University, Miami
43	51.09	Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena
(44)	51.44	Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEPR), Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(44)	56.71	International Economics Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
44	57.2	Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
45	60.27	Senter for teknologi, innovasjon og kultur (TIK), Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo

Top 5% authors in the field of Technology & Industrial Dynamics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	Author
1.	2.32	Paul Michael Romer
2.	3.44	Zvi Griliches †
3.	3.79	Adam Jaffe
4.	4.55	Michael H. Riordan
5.	4.87	Richard R. Nelson
6.	5.44	Joachim Wagner
7.	5.74	Bronwyn Hughes Hall
8.	6.51	Rudiger Dornbusch †
9.	8.68	Manuel Trajtenberg
10.	10.9	Steven Klepper
11.	11.34	Danny Quah
12.	11.54	David B. Audretsch
13.	11.88	Rebecca M. Henderson
14.	12.48	Joseph Farrell
15.	12.83	Sidney Winter
16.	13.11	Charles I. Jones
17.	15.15	Richard Schmalensee
18.	17.64	Michael L. Katz
19.	18.06	Paul A. Geroski †
20.	18.06	Michael Darby
21.	18.27	Josh Lerner
22.	19.24	Daron Acemoglu

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Technical University of Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.