RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management, as of May 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Project, Program & Portfolio Management, these are 132 authors affiliated with 434 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PPM (Project, Program & Portfolio Management).
RankScoreInstitution
11.57Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(2)2.83Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
23.54World Bank Group, Washington
(3)4.66Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
35.07Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(3)5.07Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
45.23Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
55.61Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
68.6Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
(7)13.53Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
713.66Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
814.08Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
915.79Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1016.06Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1116.31Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(11)16.31Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1216.66Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1317.5Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
1417.79Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
1518.06Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, State College
1619.91Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1720.76Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1821.92Saïd Business School, Oxford University, Oxford
1925.32Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
(20)26.33Economics Department, Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro
1926.33Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro
(21)26.73Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2126.95Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston

Top 5% authors in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.94John Vickers
2.2.02Erik Brynjolfsson
3.3.12Philip E. Graves
4.4.19Abdullah Yavas
5.4.66David F. Burgess
6.6.61Ronald David Fischer

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.