RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Post Keynesian Economics, as of May 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Post Keynesian Economics, these are 309 authors affiliated with 955 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PKE (Post Keynesian Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.04Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
22.43Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.46Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.46Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
45.23Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
57.18Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
68.53Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
79.18Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
810.21Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
910.47Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1011.02Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1112.57Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(12)12.64Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(12)13.28Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(12)14.03Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1218.66Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
1318.72World Bank Group, Washington
1418.76Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1520.79Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1621.02Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
(17)21.6Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
1723.95Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe
1824.86Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago
1925Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
2026.61Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2128.92School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
2228.94Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm
2329.42Department of Economics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury
(24)29.83School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2329.83Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2531.85Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2633.43Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2733.58Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2833.82Brookings Institution, Washington
2933.92Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
3035.81National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
3136.13School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
3238.75Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
3338.93Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3438.99Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
3539.13Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago
(36)40.15Economic Studies, Brookings Institution, Washington
3642.38Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
3742.45Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
3843.62Department of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling
3943.79Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
4043.82London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
4144.89Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
4249.61Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
4351.01Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Middlebury
4451.58Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
4554.85Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
4656.65Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington
(47)56.73Department of Economics, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
4656.73College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe

Top 5% authors in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.71Ernst Fehr
2.1.91Bruno S. Frey
3.3.81Paul A. Samuelson
4.4.48Paul R. Krugman
5.4.91Dani Rodrik
6.5.12Bruce D. Smith †
7.8Douglass C. North
8.9.27Oliver D. Hart
9.11.12Rudiger Dornbusch †
10.11.13Herbert Gintis
11.11.39William Baumol
12.11.56János Kornai
13.13.25John Moore
14.13.96David Laidler
15.14.84Deirdre N. McCloskey

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.