RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Open MacroEconomics, as of May 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Open MacroEconomics, these are 178 authors affiliated with 560 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Open MacroEconomics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-OPM (Open MacroEconomics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.08Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
22.47Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
33.89International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
44.72Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
56.32Economics Department, University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz
66.58Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
77.43Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas
(8)7.77Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
87.93Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
99.44Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
1010.1Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1112.68European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main
1214.46Sveriges Riksbank, Stockholm
1316.8Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
(14)16.88Research and Statistics Group, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
1316.88Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
(15)17.04Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
1417.04Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
1618.96Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1720.31Department of Economics, Baylor University, Waco
1820.36Økonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet, København
(19)20.46Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1921.99Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
2024.58Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2125.12Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
2225.67Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
(23)26.45Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
2326.52Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
2426.78Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
2526.96Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis
2629.04Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
2729.65National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
(28)30.24Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
2830.4Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul

Top 5% authors in the field of Open MacroEconomics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.66Nathan Balke
2.2.06Lars E. O. Svensson
3.3.89Eswar Prasad
4.4.88Joshua Aizenman
5.5.77David VanHoose
6.5.96Michael B. Devereux
7.7.71Christopher Otrok
8.8.2Mario John Crucini

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.