RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Insurance Economics, as of May 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Insurance Economics, these are 310 authors affiliated with 763 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Insurance Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-IAS (Insurance Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.43Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
22.01Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
33.48Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
44.99Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
55.47World Bank Group, Washington
65.48Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
77.79Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
89.14Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
(9)10.14Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
912.23Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
(9)12.23Finance Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
1012.35Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
1112.99Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1213.27Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1313.75Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
1416.54Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Mississauga
(15)17.34Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(15)18.3Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1418.3Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1618.31Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
1719.04Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1819.58National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
1921.79Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2022.49Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
2123.22International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
2226.56Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
2328.16Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago
(24)30.07Econometrics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
2431.78Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
2532.08Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
(26)32.26Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
2632.74Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
2733.05Département d'Économie, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau
(28)34.01Department of Economics, Carol Martin Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington
2734.01Carol Martin Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington
2935.31Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
3037.4Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington
(31)37.55Economic Studies, Brookings Institution, Washington
3037.55Brookings Institution, Washington
(32)38.95Center for Economic Policy Studies, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
3239.06HEC Montréal (École des Hautes Études Commerciales), Montréal
3340.05Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
3440.39CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg (Katholieke Universiteit Brabant), Tilburg
3543.13Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
3643.94Economics Department, Wesleyan University, Middletown
3745.94School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
3847.12Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City

Top 5% authors in the field of Insurance Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.72Gary S. Becker
2.2.27Paul Michael Romer
3.3.49Jonathan Gruber
4.4.03B. Douglas Bernheim
5.6.17James Pesando
6.6.2Kenneth A. Froot
7.6.62W Kip Viscusi
8.6.78Myron S. Scholes
9.10.72David M. Cutler
10.10.89Adam Wagstaff
11.11.49Assar Lindbeck
12.11.92Robert Shimer
13.13.2Donald O. Parsons
14.13.86Aaron Yelowitz
15.13.96Clifford M. Winston

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.