| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1 | Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago |
2 | 2.68 | Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
3 | 2.71 | Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge |
4 | 4.82 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
5 | 5.65 | Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
6 | 8.14 | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
7 | 8.23 | Department of Economics, New York University, New York City |
8 | 8.54 | Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston |
(9) | 9.77 | Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
9 | 12.32 | Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles |
10 | 13.28 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
11 | 13.36 | Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis |
12 | 13.91 | Department of Economics, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, New Brunswick |
13 | 15.84 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
14 | 16 | Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry |
15 | 16.35 | Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton |
16 | 16.47 | RAND, Santa Monica |
17 | 16.87 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
18 | 17.22 | Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, St. Louis |
19 | 17.55 | Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston |
(20) | 19.16 | Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, St. Louis |
20 | 21.07 | Economics Department, Brown University, Providence |
21 | 21.2 | Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
22 | 22.85 | Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago |
23 | 24.15 | Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles |
24 | 24.48 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge |
25 | 26.84 | Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla |
26 | 28.74 | Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City |
(27) | 30.05 | Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City |
27 | 33.44 | Economics Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover |
28 | 34.76 | Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven |
29 | 34.78 | Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville |
30 | 35.56 | Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara |
31 | 36.37 | Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
32 | 38.78 | London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London |
33 | 39.68 | Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby |
34 | 40.27 | Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
35 | 41.22 | International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington |
(36) | 41.39 | School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
35 | 41.39 | Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
37 | 42.94 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
38 | 44.04 | World Bank Group, Washington |
39 | 44.83 | Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
40 | 45.76 | Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London |
41 | 46.57 | Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
42 | 47.02 | Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City |
43 | 48.53 | Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago |
44 | 49.63 | Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
45 | 50.05 | Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
46 | 50.4 | Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles |
(46) | 50.4 | Global Economics & Management Group, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles |
47 | 53.43 | Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Cleveland |
48 | 55.44 | Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington |
(49) | 55.79 | Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton |
49 | 59.61 | Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin |
(50) | 59.66 | Economics Department, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City |
50 | 59.73 | Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
(50) | 59.73 | Strategy and Business Economics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
51 | 60.25 | Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
52 | 60.6 | School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City |
53 | 63.79 | Department of Economics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem |
54 | 64.68 | Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München |
55 | 64.95 | Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder |
(56) | 65.35 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
56 | 65.85 | Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge |
57 | 68.65 | Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington |
58 | 68.97 | Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich |
59 | 70.23 | Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge |
60 | 70.72 | Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
