RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Financial Development & Growth, as of May 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Financial Development & Growth, these are 88 authors affiliated with 444 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Financial Development & Growth

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-FDG (Financial Development & Growth).
RankScoreInstitution
(1)2.22Stanford Center for International Development (SCID), Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
02.22Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
22.43Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(2)2.43Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
32.89International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
45.78Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
56.17World Bank Group, Washington
(6)7.65Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
67.73Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
710.82Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
811.13Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
913.25Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca
1015.79Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(11)15.89Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
1117.72Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1219.31Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
1320.1Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
(14)21.14Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1423.12Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
(14)23.12Global Economics & Management Group, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1523.78Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1624.28Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill
1724.4Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington
1825.87Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1926.18Brookings Institution, Washington
(20)28.15Global Economy and Development Program, Brookings Institution, Washington
2029.17Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
2130.26Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (WIFO), Wien
2230.51Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City

Top 5% authors in the field of Financial Development & Growth

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.05John B. Taylor
2.2.51Eswar Prasad
3.4.03Ayhan Kose
4.4.55Ramon Lopez

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.