RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 20% Institutions and Economists in South Korea, as of April 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For South Korea, there are 93 authors affiliated with 40 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to a formula.

All institutions in this region.

Top 20% institutions in South Korea

RankScoreW.RankInstitution
11[1]Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul
22.38[2]Division of Economics, Seoul National University, Seoul
(3)3.32[2]Department of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul
23.32[3]College of Business and Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul
44[4]College of Economics, Sogang University, Seoul
55.04[5]Technology Management, Economics and Policy Program (TEPP), Seoul National University, Seoul
67.05[6]School of Economics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul
78.75[7]Department of Economics, Kyung Hee University, Seoul
89.95[8]Korea Development Institute (KDI), Seoul

Top 20% authors in South Korea

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC.
RankScoreW.RankAuthorAffiliated with (in this region)
1.1.31[1]Jong-Wha Lee Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul
2.2.46[3]Soyoung Kim Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul
3.3.28[2]Almas Heshmati Technology Management, Economics and Policy Program (TEPP), Seoul National University, Seoul
4.4.48[4]Chang-Jin Kim Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul
5.5.34[6]Jang-Ok Cho College of Economics, Sogang University, Seoul
6.6.01[7]Kwanho Shin Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul
7.7.66[8]Sang-Seung Yi Division of Economics, Seoul National University, Seoul
8.8.6[9]Yoon-Jae Whang Division of Economics, Seoul National University, Seoul
9.9.11[10]Minseong Kim School of Economics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul
10.9.18[12]Chulhee Lee Division of Economics, Seoul National University, Seoul
11.13.41[14]Byung-Yeon Kim Division of Economics, Seoul National University, Seoul
12.13.92[13]Tae-Hwan Kim College of Business and Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul
Department of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul
13.14.53[15]Jeong-Yoo Kim Department of Economics, Kyung Hee University, Seoul
14.15.17[16]Woochan Kim Korea Development Institute (KDI), Seoul
School of Public Policy and Management, Korea Development Institute (KDI), Seoul
15.15.81[17]Sun-Bin Kim Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul
16.15.97[18]Keun-Yeob Oh Department of International Trade, College of Economics and Management, Chungnam National University, Taejon
College of Economics and Management, Chungnam National University, Taejon
17.17.01[5]Yongsung Chang College of Business and Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul
Department of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul
18.17.32[19]Byoung Heon Jun Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.