RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management, as of April 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Project, Program & Portfolio Management, these are 128 authors affiliated with 426 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PPM (Project, Program & Portfolio Management).
RankScoreInstitution
11.47World Bank Group, Washington
(2)2.58Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
24.25Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(2)4.25Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
34.31Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
44.38Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
57.05Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
610.07Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
711.64Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
811.99Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
(9)12Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
912.95Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
1013.67Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(10)13.67Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1114.27Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, State College
1214.66Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1315.72Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
1417.11Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1517.64Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
1618.22Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1721.84Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
1822.3Saïd Business School, Oxford University, Oxford
(19)23.74Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(19)24.33Economics Department, Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro
1824.33Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro
2026.04Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile, Santiago
2127.99Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton

Top 5% authors in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.99John Vickers
2.2.08Erik Brynjolfsson
3.2.82Philip E. Graves
4.4.3Abdullah Yavas
5.4.6David F. Burgess
6.6.37Ronald David Fischer

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.