RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Post Keynesian Economics, as of April 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Post Keynesian Economics, these are 301 authors affiliated with 944 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PKE (Post Keynesian Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.04Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
22.45Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.48Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.36Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
45.3Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
57.03Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
68.48Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
78.96Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
810.19Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
910.33Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1011.02Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1112.42Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(12)12.81Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(12)13.2Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(12)13.68Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1218.13World Bank Group, Washington
1318.42Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1419.18Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
1520.24Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
(16)21.03Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
1623.29Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago
1723.69Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1825.04Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1925.52Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe
2028.12Department of Economics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury
2128.13School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
(22)28.32School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2128.32Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2330.2Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2431.58Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2532.06Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2634.07National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
2734.86Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
2835.01Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2835.01Brookings Institution, Washington
3035.49School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
3136.03Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
3236.42Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
3337.87Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3438.23Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
3539.88Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago
3640.68Department of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling
(37)41.32Economic Studies, Brookings Institution, Washington
3742.11Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
3844.88London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
3948.44Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Middlebury
4049.33Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
4152.39Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
(42)52.98Department of Economics, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
4152.98College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
4353.67Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
4454.06Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
4554.23Levy Economics Institute, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson
4654.4Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, State College
4754.61Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London

Top 5% authors in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.69Ernst Fehr
2.1.91Bruno S. Frey
3.3.77Paul A. Samuelson
4.4.48Paul R. Krugman
5.5.08Dani Rodrik
6.5.19Bruce D. Smith †
7.8.52Douglass C. North
8.8.89Oliver D. Hart
9.10.73Rudiger Dornbusch †
10.11.29Herbert Gintis
11.11.32William Baumol
12.11.56János Kornai
13.13.12John Moore
14.13.64David Laidler
15.15.15Deirdre N. McCloskey

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.