RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Financial Development & Growth, as of April 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Financial Development & Growth, these are 84 authors affiliated with 412 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Financial Development & Growth

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-FDG (Financial Development & Growth).
RankScoreInstitution
(1)2.18Stanford Center for International Development (SCID), Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
02.18Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
22.41Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(2)2.41Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
33.03International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
45.3Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
56.59World Bank Group, Washington
67.83Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
(7)7.9Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
710.61Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
811.12Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
912.48Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca
1013.05Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(11)15.16Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
1119.17Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
(12)19.77Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1222.53Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill
1322.83Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington
1422.87Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1524.05Brookings Institution, Washington
1624.25Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1726.05Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
(18)26.08Global Economy and Development Program, Brookings Institution, Washington
1828.44Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
(18)28.44Global Economics & Management Group, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1928.9National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
2029.09Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (WIFO), Wien

Top 5% authors in the field of Financial Development & Growth

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.04John B. Taylor
2.2.34Eswar Prasad
3.3.76Ayhan Kose
4.5.44Marco E. Terrones

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.