RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Financial Development & Growth, as of February 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Financial Development & Growth, these are 71 authors affiliated with 369 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Financial Development & Growth

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-FDG (Financial Development & Growth).
RankScoreInstitution
12.03Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(1)2.03Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
22.54Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
33.13International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
44.95World Bank Group, Washington
(5)6.13Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
(5)6.25Stanford Center for International Development (SCID), Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
46.25Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
67.66Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
79.03Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
811.68Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca
915.3Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
(10)16.67Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
1017.17Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
(11)17.7George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1117.81Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
(12)18.37Applied Economics Workshop, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1219.8Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1320.13Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1421.14Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1522.96Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington
1624.15Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
(16)24.15Global Economics & Management Group, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1724.21Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
(18)26.96Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(18)27.15Department of Economics, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
1727.15College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe

Top 5% authors in the field of Financial Development & Growth

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.4Eswar Prasad
2.2.74Ramon Lopez
3.3Ayhan Kose

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.