RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory, as of December 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Utility Models & Prospect Theory, these are 299 authors affiliated with 751 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-UPT (Utility Models & Prospect Theory).
RankScoreInstitution
11.69Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
21.8National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
32.91Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
43.76Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
(5)4.53Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
56.45Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
68.84Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
79.01Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
810.94CESifo, München
911.03Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1012.01Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
1112.1London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
1214.95Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1317.02Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1417.38School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
1517.77Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1619.77Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
(17)20.07Economics Group, Nuffield College, Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(17)20.33Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1723.69Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
1823.95ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
1924.95Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2026.17Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(21)26.2Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
2126.25Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
(22)26.74School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2126.74Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2328.03Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2428.95Collegio Carlo Alberto, Moncalieri
2529.17Paris-Jourdan Sciences Économiques (PSE), École Normale Supérieure, Paris
2629.42Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2729.7Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
2829.75School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
(29)30.15Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
2931.6National Centre for Econometric Research (NCER), Brisbane/Sydney
2931.6Institute of Local Public Finance (ILPF), Langen
3136.43School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich
3236.72Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
3338.38Dipartimento di Statistica e Matematica Applicata "D. De Castro", Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino
3439.38International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
3539.44Centre de Recerca en Economia Internacional (CREI), Barcelona
3642.76Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne), Paris
(37)42.88Foerder Institute for Economic Research, Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
3743.34Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City

Top 5% authors in the field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Bruno S. Frey
2.2.81John Moore
3.4.46Robert Sugden
4.4.89Benno Torgler
5.6.57David Schmeidler
6.6.61Chris D Orme
7.8.12Mark Huggett
8.8.49Sujoy Mukerji
9.9.61Massimo Marinacci
10.10.53Uzi Segal
11.11.14Dan Usher
12.11.33Arthur John Robson
13.13.39Kevin Roberts
14.13.44Itzhak Gilboa

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.