RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Market Microstructure, as of December 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Market Microstructure, these are 92 authors affiliated with 302 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Market Microstructure

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-MST (Market Microstructure).
RankScoreInstitution
11National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
22.07Center for Research in Econometric Analysis of Time Series (CREATES), Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus
33.05Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
44.2Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham
55.46Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
66.55Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
(7)6.76Department of Finance, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
711.68Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
(7)11.68Department of Economics, Business School, University of Auckland, Auckland
711.68Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
711.68Business School, University of Auckland, Auckland
711.68Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York
1113.47Rimini Center for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini
(12)15.9Bendheim Center for Finance, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1115.9Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
(13)16.68Economic Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago
1216.68Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
1216.68Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago
1518.23Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford

Top 5% authors in the field of Market Microstructure

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Tim Bollerslev
2.2.41Torben G. Andersen
3.3.81Ricardo Lagos
4.4.35Neil Shephard

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.