RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Knowledge Management & Knowledge Economy, as of December 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Knowledge Management & Knowledge Economy, these are 271 authors affiliated with 716 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Knowledge Management & Knowledge Economy

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-KNM (Knowledge Management & Knowledge Economy).
RankScoreInstitution
11.47National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
23.02Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
33.4Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
44.49Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
54.86School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
65.49Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
76.4Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
87.36Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
97.72Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(10)8.43Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(10)8.87Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1012.88Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
1113.97Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
1214.39London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
1314.78Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
1415.01Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
1518.36Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
1619.06Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
(17)19.33Department of Finance and Economics, School of Management, Boston University, Boston
1619.33School of Management, Boston University, Boston
1820.07School of Economics, University College Dublin, Dublin
1920.23United Nations University-Maastricht Economic Research Institute of Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT), Maastricht
2022.23Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena
2125.08Dipartimento di Economia "S. Cognetti de Martiis", Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino
2226.61ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
2327.2World Bank Group, Washington
2430.02Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot
2530.11Institute for Policy Research (IPR), Northwestern University, Evanston
(26)31.37Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
2631.52Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
2732Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2834.09Collegio Carlo Alberto, Moncalieri
2934.96Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
3035.27Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(31)35.38Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
3136.19CESifo, München
3237.44Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
3337.8Centro di ricerca sui processi di innovazione e internazionalizzazione (CESPRI), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milano
(34)38.57Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(34)40.68European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
3443.64Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
3543.96International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington

Top 5% authors in the field of Knowledge Management & Knowledge Economy

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.8Shulamit Kahn
2.2.64Yair Mundlak
3.4.3David B. Audretsch
4.4.44Cristiano Antonelli
5.4.88Zoltan J. Acs
6.6.37David Theodore Coe
7.7.33James Marvin Walker
8.7.91Sujoy Mukerji
9.10.58Steve Dowrick
10.10.63Ignatius J. Horstmann
11.10.8Franco Malerba
12.13.17Guido Cozzi
13.14.93António Brandão Moniz

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.