RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory, as of October 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Utility Models & Prospect Theory, these are 284 authors affiliated with 716 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-UPT (Utility Models & Prospect Theory).
RankScoreInstitution
11.73Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
21.74National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
32.87Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
43.8Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
(5)4.27Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
56.45Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
68.85Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
78.87Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
810.65CESifo, München
911.26Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1012.11Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
1113.68Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1214.56London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
1317.13School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
1417.31Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1518.32Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1619.05Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
(17)19.91Economics Group, Nuffield College, Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(17)21.39Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1723.85Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1825.19Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
1926.59Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2026.85Paris-Jourdan Sciences Économiques (PSE), École Normale Supérieure, Paris
2127.07ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
(22)27.11School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2127.11Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2327.5Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
2427.98Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2528.04School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
(26)29.65Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
2629.73Collegio Carlo Alberto, Moncalieri
(27)30.06Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
2730.15Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
2831.12National Centre for Econometric Research (NCER), Brisbane/Sydney
2831.12Institute of Local Public Finance (ILPF), Langen
3034.89Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
3135.32School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich
3237.21Théorie Économique, Modélisation, Application (THEMA), Université de Cergy-Pontoise, Cergy-Pontoise
3337.48Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
3439.17Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham
3539.34Centre de Recerca en Economia Internacional (CREI), Barcelona

Top 5% authors in the field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Bruno S. Frey
2.2.76John Moore
3.4.27Robert Sugden
4.4.89Benno Torgler
5.6.6Chris D Orme
6.6.6David Schmeidler
7.8Sujoy Mukerji
8.8.1Mark Huggett
9.9.72Uzi Segal
10.10.54Dan Usher
11.11.53Massimo Marinacci
12.11.75Chris Starmer
13.12.52Kevin Roberts
14.12.57Itzhak Gilboa

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.