RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of History & Philosophy of Economics, as of October 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For History & Philosophy of Economics, these are 410 authors affiliated with 832 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of History & Philosophy of Economics

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-HPE (History & Philosophy of Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.54Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
21.6National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
33.59CESifo, München
45.01Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
56.44Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
67.77Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
67.77Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
87.83Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
98.43Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
109.8Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1110.05Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
1210.62Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
1311.6Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
(14)11.68Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
1412.73Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
(15)13.06Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1514.57Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
1618.26Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1720.25Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1820.36Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
1920.96RAND, Santa Monica
1920.96Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2121.34Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
2224.22Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
2327.04Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
2428.11Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
2528.38Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
2630.4Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
2731.53C. D. Howe Institute, Toronto
2833.58Département économie et finance, Groupe EDHEC (École de Hautes Études Commerciales du Nord), Université Catholique de Lille, Lille
2934.19London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
3034.39Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
3134.62Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
3234.76Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
3336.17Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover
3436.47Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
3538.24Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
3638.74Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3739.81Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3840.61School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
3940.76Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
4042.83Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
4145.14Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Top 5% authors in the field of History & Philosophy of Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.43Bruno S. Frey
2.2.31Paul A. Samuelson
3.3.54Andrei Shleifer
4.5.22Edward Lazear
5.6.38Robert M. Solow
6.7.12David Laidler
7.8.06Harold Demsetz
8.8.82Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes
9.9Rafael La Porta
10.10.03János Kornai
11.11.95J. Scott Armstrong
12.12.04Richard R. Nelson
13.13.03Roger B. Myerson
14.13.79Ted Bergstrom
15.14.95Deirdre N. McCloskey
16.15.21Andrew J. Oswald
17.15.35Herschel I. Grossman †
18.15.4Douglass C. North
19.15.76Edward Ludwig Glaeser
20.16.17David Colander

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.