RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of History & Philosophy of Economics, as of September 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For History & Philosophy of Economics, these are 399 authors affiliated with 823 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of History & Philosophy of Economics

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-HPE (History & Philosophy of Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.58Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
11.58National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
33.68CESifo, München
44.8Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
56.39Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
67.54Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
67.54Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
87.99Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
98.9Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
109.35Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
119.8Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1210.89Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
1311.09Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1411.48Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
(15)11.91Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(15)12.95Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1514.69Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
1618.38Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1719.01RAND, Santa Monica
1820.72Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
1922.08Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2022.24Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
2123.7Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
2224.79Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
2326.44Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
2426.82Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
2529.37Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
2630.09C. D. Howe Institute, Toronto
2731.99Département économie et finance, Groupe EDHEC (École de Hautes Études Commerciales du Nord), Université Catholique de Lille, Lille
2832.32London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
2932.35Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
3032.55Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
3135.31Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover
3235.75Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
3336.09Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3437.17Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
3537.78Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
3638.59Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3739.06Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
3839.76Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
3939.85School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
4042.12Brookings Institution, Washington
4142.86Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Top 5% authors in the field of History & Philosophy of Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.68Bruno S. Frey
2.2.35Paul A. Samuelson
3.3.26Andrei Shleifer
4.4.53Edward Lazear
5.6.13Robert M. Solow
6.7.17David Laidler
7.8.24Harold Demsetz
8.8.91Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes
9.9.18Rafael La Porta
10.9.75János Kornai
11.11.91J. Scott Armstrong
12.12.37Richard R. Nelson
13.12.89Ted Bergstrom
14.13.89Roger B. Myerson
15.14.91Deirdre N. McCloskey
16.15.04Andrew J. Oswald
17.15.06Herschel I. Grossman †
18.15.11John Geweke
19.15.14Douglass C. North

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.