Within Country and State Rankings at IDEAS: Colorado (United States)

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 20% Institutions and Economists in Colorado (United States), as of March 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Colorado (United States), these are 42 authors affiliated with 13 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
Rankings in other regions
More rankings.
All institutions in this region.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
Rankings for the United States and links to state rankings are available here.

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 20% institutions in Colorado (United States)

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in (round parentheses). Rankings correspond to a calculation taking into account only the institutions from this region. Ranks in [square parentheses] correspond to an extract from the world rankings. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	W.Rank	Institution
1	1	[1]	Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
2	2.95	[2]	Department of Economics, University of Denver, Denver

Top 20% authors in Colorado (United States)

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC. Rankings correspond to a calculation taking into account only the institutions from this region. Ranks in [square parentheses] correspond to an extract from the world rankings. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	W.Rank	Author	Affiliated with (in this region)
1.	1	[1]	James R. Markusen	Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
2.	2.45	[2]	Wolfgang Keller	Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
3.	3.24	[3]	Keith E. Maskus	Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
4.	4.95	[6]	Yongmin Chen	Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
5.	5.58	[4]	Stephen Ross Yeaple	Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
6.	7.14	[8]	Murat F. Iyigun	Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
7.	7.73	[9]	Lee J. Alston	Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
8.	7.83	[10]	Charles de Bartolome	Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Technical University of Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.