RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Africa, as of March 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Africa, these are 374 authors affiliated with 595 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Africa

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-AFR (Africa).
RankScoreInstitution
11.45National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
21.91Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
33.7International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
44.09World Bank Group, Washington
(5)4.29Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
57.12Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
67.5Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
(7)10.06Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(7)12.08Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
712.6Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
813.3Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
913.91Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
1014.12Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing
1114.49Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1215.97Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(13)17.21Economics Area, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham
1217.21Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham
1418.92Department of Finance, University of Notre Dame, South Bend
1519.11Department of International Development (Queen Elizabeth House), Oxford University, Oxford
(16)19.4Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1519.4Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1719.66Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
1820.35Center for Global Development (CGD), Washington
(19)21.06Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1922.12Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
2023.78Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
(20)23.78Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
2125.55International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington
(22)27.39Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP), Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(21)27.39George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2127.39Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(23)30.02Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
(23)30.59Macroeconomics and Growth Research, World Bank Group, Washington
2331.32CESifo, München
2431.93Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2534.54Brookings Institution, Washington
2636.72School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town
2738.64Department of Population and International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge
2839.73Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics (IIE), Washington
2941.03Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto

Top 5% authors in the field of Africa

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.2.31William Easterly
2.2.75Wilbur John Coleman II
3.2.9Paul Collier
4.3.27Jeffrey H. Bergstrand
5.6.42Richard S.J. Tol
6.8.25Adrian Wood
7.8.28Arvind Subramanian
8.8.93John Muellbauer
9.11.09Stefan Dercon
10.11.38Thomas S. Jayne
11.11.9Marcel Fafchamps
12.15.09Nicholas William Minot
13.15.31Douglas Gollin
14.15.67Caroline van Rijckeghem
15.16.08David Malin Roodman
16.16.63John B Knight
17.17.3David A. Lam
18.18.92Robert H. Bates

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.