RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Innovation, as of February 2008

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Innovation, these are 788 authors affiliated with 966 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Innovation

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-INO (Innovation).
RankScoreInstitution
11National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
22.46Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
33.91Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
45.07United Nations University-Maastricht Economic Research Institute of Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT), Maastricht
56.19Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
66.2Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
77.62Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
88.56London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
99Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
109.63Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1110.98Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1212Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1314.15Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht
1415.19Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1515.58Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
1616.37Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1717.42Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1817.63School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
1919.75Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
2019.88International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham
2119.93Department of Economics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem
(22)20.04Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
2220.12Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(23)21.95Vakgroep Algemene Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht
2322.66Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
2422.85Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
2526.43Senter for teknologi, innovasjon og kultur (TIK), Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo
2628.78Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2731.08Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
2834.24Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
2934.37Department of Economics, University College London, University of London, London
3036.41Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Bologna
3137.79Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
3238.23Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(33)40.23Center for Research on Employment and Economic Growth, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
3340.95Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
(34)41Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
3441.26Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(35)45.06Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
3546.59CESifo, München
3647.26Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
(37)47.38Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
3748.53Rimini Center for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini
(38)49.46Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique (CREST), Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE), Government of France, Paris
3749.46Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE), Government of France, Paris
3949.84Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
4049.92European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles
4151.36Department of Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy
4251.6Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm
4352.91Centro di ricerca sui processi di innovazione e internazionalizzazione (CESPRI), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milano
4454.33Solvay Business School, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles
(44)54.33Centre Emile Bernheim, Solvay Business School, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles
4555.44Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
4655.8Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa
4756.22Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia
(47)56.22Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia
4858.09Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill

Top 5% authors in the field of Innovation

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.4Paul Michael Romer
2.4.23Adam Jaffe
3.5.22Bronwyn Hughes Hall
4.5.64Peter Howitt
5.6.48Boyan Jovanovic
6.6.7Robert J. Gordon
7.7.09Richard R. Nelson
8.7.27William Baumol
9.8.98Daron Acemoglu
10.9.73Edmund S. Phelps
11.10.63Sudipto Bhattacharya
12.11.36Timothy Bresnahan
13.12.38Bart Verspagen
14.13.4John Michael van Reenen
15.13.68David B. Audretsch
16.13.88Cristiano Antonelli
17.15.41James D. Adams
18.15.51Jacques Mairesse
19.15.55Manuel Trajtenberg
20.16.03Jan Ernst Fagerberg
21.18.37Michael Darby
22.21.58Richard A. Posner
23.21.66Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie
24.22.75Mark E. Doms
25.22.93Josh Lerner
26.24.66Rachel Griffith
27.25.36Jerry Thursby
28.25.54Zoltan J. Acs
29.26.58Sidney Winter
30.27.75Timothy Dunne
31.27.8Susanto Basu
32.34.12Jonathan E. Haskel
33.35.67Luc Anselin
34.36.66Dietmar Harhoff
35.37.22Richard A. Jensen
36.37.78Dale Jorgenson
37.38.66David Genesove
38.38.75Iain M. Cockburn
39.41.51Eve Caroli

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.