RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Industrial Organization, as of December 2007

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Industrial Organization, these are 304 authors affiliated with 754 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Industrial Organization

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-IND (Industrial Organization).
RankScoreInstitution
11National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
22.22Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
33.38CESifo, München
44.62Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
54.79Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
65.84Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
76.15Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
87.21Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
99.53Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
1010.84Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1110.95Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(12)12.15Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(12)15.86Center for Research on Employment and Economic Growth, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
1115.86Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
1316.3Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1418.12School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
1518.34Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1618.83Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1718.95Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1819.28Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1919.87Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2019.88Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
2123.85Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(22)25.63Strategy and Business Economics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2125.63Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2328.64Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
2428.85Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2528.86Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
2629.64Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
2729.71Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2832.6Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2933.15Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3033.65Department of Finance, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin
3133.99Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
3235.02Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
3338.6Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
(34)38.83Financial Institutions Center, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3440.27Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
3541.53Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
3643.71Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
3744.01Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge

Top 5% authors in the field of Industrial Organization

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.72Timothy Bresnahan
2.1.84Sanford Jay Grossman
3.4.14Michael H. Riordan
4.4.88Larry H. P. Lang
5.4.98David Levine
6.6.83Allen N. Berger
7.7.46Margaret Emily Slade
8.7.65Joel Sobel
9.8.45Thomas Wayne Ross
10.10.15Erik Brynjolfsson
11.11.92Paul A. Geroski †
12.12.05Mamoru Kaneko
13.12.4Michael Waterson
14.12.4Charles A. Holt
15.13.61Randolph Preston McAfee

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.