RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Cognitive & Behavioural Economics, as of December 2007

These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Cognitive & Behavioural Economics, these are 494 authors affiliated with 765 institutions.
For the worldwide rankings, see here: top 5% authors or top 5% economics institutions.
More rankings.
All authors classified in this field.
The rankings below are aggregate rankings from 31 different ranking methods, excluding worst and best method. See links above for details.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Cognitive & Behavioural Economics

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Subentities of ranked institutions do not increment the rank count and have their rank listed in parentheses. Register at the RePEc Author Service.

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CBE (Cognitive & Behavioural Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
23.45Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
33.63Economics Department, George Mason University, Fairfax
(4)4.81Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
45.12National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
57.05Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science (ICES), George Mason University, Fairfax
68.7Paris-Jourdan Sciences Économiques (PSE), École Normale Supérieure, Paris
79.62Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
89.65Center for Economic Design, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, İstanbul
89.65Cato Institute, Washington
109.93Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
1111.18Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1212.49Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
1312.5Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
1413.82Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1515.15CESifo, München
1615.77Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
1716.86School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
1817.12Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
1918.55Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2020.19Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
2122Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
(22)22.87Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2223.94School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
2325.21School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich
2425.71Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
2527.89Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
2627.9Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
2729.26Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
2830.58Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa
2931.57Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
3032.39Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
3133.68Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
3234.12Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3335.86Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(34)37.9Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx), School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
3438.51DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin
3538.8Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Fairfax
3538.8Center for the Study of Neuroeconomics, George Mason University, Fairfax
3738.89Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
3840.21Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore

Top 5% authors in the field of Cognitive & Behavioural Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.78Vernon L. Smith
2.2.09Ernst Fehr
3.4.49Richard R. Nelson
4.7.31Andrew Schotter
5.7.75George Loewenstein
6.7.94J. Scott Armstrong
7.8.13James Andreoni
8.8.61Larry G. Epstein
9.8.95Klaus M. Schmidt
10.9.09Robert Sugden
11.10.14Andrew J. Oswald
12.10.91Bruno S. Frey
13.11.15Andrew Clark
14.11.42Simon Gächter
15.12Kevin McCabe
16.12.87Geoffrey Martin Hodgson
17.13.75Louis Putterman
18.14.89Alois Stutzer
19.15.01Armin Falk
20.15.65Vincent P. Crawford
21.20.01Thomas H. Noe
22.20.04H. Peyton Young
23.22.65Nicolai Foss
24.24.04Sidney Winter

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.