IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login

Citations for "What Makes a Great Journal Great in the Sciences? Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg?"

by Chia-Lin Chang & Philip Hans Franses & Michael McAleer & Les Oxley

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window

  1. Chang, C-L. & McAleer, M.J., 2014. "Quality Weighted Citations Versus Total Citations in the Sciences and Social Sciences," Econometric Institute Research Papers 50641, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
  2. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2012. "What do Experts Know About Ranking Journal Quality? A Comparison with ISI Research Impact in Finance," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2012-01, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
  3. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2013. "Ranking Leading Econometrics Journals Using Citations Data from ISI and RePEc," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2013-34, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
  4. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2011. "How Should Journal Quality be Ranked? An Application to Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics," Working Papers in Economics 11/43, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
  5. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Les Oxley, 2013. "Journal Impact Factor, Eigenfactor, Journal Influence and Article Influence," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-002/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  6. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2014. "Just how Good are the Top Three Journals in Finance? An Assessment based on Quantity and Quality Citations," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-062/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  7. Chang, C-L. & McAleer, M.J., 2015. "Quality Weighted Citations Versus Total Citations in the Sciences and Social Sciences, with an Application to Finance and Accounting," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2015-05, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
  8. Chang, C-L. & McAleer, M.J., 2012. "Ranking Journal Quality by Harmonic Mean of Ranks: An Application to ISI Statistics & Probability," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2012-16, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
  9. Chia-Lin Chang & Li-Hsueh Chen & Shawkat Hammoudeh & Michael McAleer, 2010. "Asymmetric Adjustments in the Ethanol and Grains Markets," KIER Working Papers 752, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
  10. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2011. "Citations and Impact of ISI Tourism and Hospitality Journals," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2011-26, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
  11. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Les Oxley, 2013. "Coercive Journal Self Citations, Impact Factor, Journal Influence and Article Influence," KIER Working Papers 852, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
  12. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2013. "What Do Experts Know About Forecasting Journal Quality? A Comparison with ISI Research Impact in Finance," Working Papers in Economics 13/10, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
  13. Chia-Lin Chang & Esfandiar Maasoumi & Michael McAleer, 2013. "Robust Ranking of Journal Quality: An Application to Economics," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-081/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  14. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2014. "Ranking Economics and Econometrics ISI Journals by Quality Weighted Citations," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-026/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  15. Chang, C-L. & McAleer, M.J., 2014. "Just How Good are the Top Three Journals in Finance? An Assessment Based on Quantity and Quality Citations," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2014-18, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
  16. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2014. "Quality Weighted Citations Versus Total Citations in the Sciences and Social Sciences," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-023/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  17. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2015. "Bibliometric Rankings of Journals based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-044/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  18. Chia-Lin Chang & Esfandiar Maasoumi & Michael McAleer, 2012. "Robust Ranking of Journal Quality: An Application to Economics," Working Papers in Economics 12/05, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
  19. Haucap, Justus & Muck, Johannes, 2013. "What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists," DICE Discussion Papers 103, Heinrich‐Heine‐Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
  20. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Les Oxley, 2012. "Journal Impact Factor, Eigenfactor, Journal Influence and Article Influence," KIER Working Papers 822, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
  21. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2013. "Ranking Leading Econometrics Journals using Citations Data from ISI and RePEc," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-173/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  22. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer, 2014. "Ranking Economics and Econometrics ISI Journals by Quality Weighted Citations," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-026/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  23. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Les Oxley, 2013. "Coercive Journal Self Citations, Impact Factor, Journal Influence and Article Influence," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-040/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  24. Walters, William H., 2014. "Do Article Influence scores overestimate the citation impact of social science journals in subfields that are related to higher-impact natural science disciplines?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 421-430.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.