IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vpi/wpaper/e07-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consistency Requirements and Pattern Methods in Cost Sharing Problems with Technological Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Bahel
  • Christian Trudeau

Abstract

In the cost sharing model with technological cooperation, we investigate the implications of a number of consistency requirements. In a context where the enforcing authority cannot prevent agents from splitting or merging their demands (in order to reduce their cost shares), the methods used must make such manipulations unprofitable. The paper introduces a family of rules that are immune to these demand manipulations, the pattern methods. For each of these methods, the associated production pattern indicates how to use the different technologies in order to meet the agents demands. Within this family, two rules stand out: the public Aumann-Shapley rule never rewards technological cooperation; and the private Aumann-Shapley rule generates the maximum technological rent for homogeneous problems. The paper also studies the sharing methods that are immune to manipulations of the technology. A useful axiomatization of the public Aumann-Shapley rule ensues: it is the unique flow method that is immune to demand maneuvers and technology manipulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Bahel & Christian Trudeau, 2012. "Consistency Requirements and Pattern Methods in Cost Sharing Problems with Technological Cooperation," Working Papers e07-34, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:vpi:wpaper:e07-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://repec.econ.vt.edu/Papers/Bahel/NMS_Nov10.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bahel, Eric, 2012. "Rock–paper–scissors and cycle-based games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 115(3), pages 401-403.
    2. Philippe Robert-Demontrond & R. Ringoot, 2004. "Introduction," Post-Print halshs-00081823, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cost sharing; demand; technology; manipulations; production pattern;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vpi:wpaper:e07-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Djavad Salehi-Isfahani). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/decvtus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.