IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uct/uconnp/2017-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Religiosity: Identifying the Effect of Pluralism

Author

Listed:
  • Metin M. Cosgel

    (University of Connecticut)

  • Jungbin Hwang

    (University of Connecticut)

  • Chihwa Kao

    (University of Connecticut)

  • Thomas J. Miceli

    (University of Connecticut)

Abstract

One of the most controversial questions in the study of religion has been the effect of pluralism on religiosity. Whereas sociologists of religion have traditionally predicted a negative relationship between pluralism and religious vitality, advocates of a supply-side approach have recently challenged this view, arguing that religious pluralism has increased vitality. Despite a large number of empirical studies devoted to this question, the results have been mixed. We argue that the main reason for the inability of scholars to reach a consensus on this important question has been the failure to deal appropriately with the endogeneity problem arising from omitted variables affecting both pluralism and religiosity. To remedy this, we offer a systematic analysis of influences on religiosity, combining information from the World Values Survey (1981-2014) with controls on the geographic and historical characteristics of nations and annual data on macroeconomic variables, relationship between state and religion, and religious pluralism. To address endogeneity concerns regarding the relationship between pluralism and religiosity, we exploit the variation among nations in their geographic distance to religious “capitals” of the world as an instrument. The OLS results reveal a negative and highly significant effect of pluralism on religiosity, which persists as we variously control for other factors. However, the association largely disappears when we correct for the omitted variable bias through the 2SLS analysis. Specifically, the magnitude and statistical significance of the effect of pluralism both fall sharply. Our results cast doubt on the causal interpretations of the negative relationship between pluralism and religiosity found by some studies, while offering a way to reconcile the conflicting results found in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Metin M. Cosgel & Jungbin Hwang & Chihwa Kao & Thomas J. Miceli, 2017. "Religiosity: Identifying the Effect of Pluralism," Working papers 2017-01, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, revised Jun 2017.
  • Handle: RePEc:uct:uconnp:2017-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://web2.uconn.edu/economics/working/2017-01R.pdf
    File Function: Full text (revised version)
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://web2.uconn.edu/economics/working/2017-01.pdf
    File Function: Full text (original version)
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    religiosity; pluralism; diversity; state; secularization; religious concentration; political economy; endogeneity; identification;

    JEL classification:

    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General
    • N30 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • O5 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies
    • P5 - Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems
    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uct:uconnp:2017-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark McConnel). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/deuctus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.