IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Calculating Fair Market Value in Legal Valuations: Do Adjustments in Value for Non-Systematic Risk Violate the Fair Market Value Standard?

Listed author(s):
  • Peter Dawson
Registered author(s):

    Generally-accepted appraisal practice assumes the Hypothetical Buyer is not well-diversified because the typical real-world buyer does not possess sufficient wealth to own a well-diversified portfolio with assets each in similar value to the subject closely-held interest under appraisal (e.g., see Estate of Hendrickson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1999-278, 78 T.C.M. (CCH) 322). This reflects a failure to appreciate the distinction, in all its implications, between the purely fictional Hypothetical Buyer and the typical real-world buyer. “The world of fair market value is not the real world”; it is not “populated by real people” (Mercer and Brown 1999, p.16). “The particular characteristics of these hypothetical persons are not necessarily the same as those of any specific individual or entity” (Estate of Noble v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2005-2), p.12), such as the typical real-world investor. Fair Market Value is determined under hypothetical market “conditions other than those that actually exist” in real-world markets (Bonbright 1937, p.27). “[‘]The effort is to find out not what a real buyer and a real seller, under conditions actually surrounding them, do, but what a purely imaginary buyer will pay a make-believe seller, under conditions which do not exist[’]” (Bonbright 1937, p.61, citing McGill v. Commercial Credit Co. (243 Fed. 637, 647 (D. Md. 1917))). Being simultaneously financially able, well-informed, and rational, all Hypothetical Buyers are defined to possess the following concurrent characteristics: All (a) command the financial resources needed to purchase the subject closely-held interest, (b) know the benefits of diversification, and (c) behave rationally by investing in a well-diversified portfolio of assets—each in a similar dollar amount to the subject interest—prudently aimed at maximizing portfolio return. Always rational and well-diversified, no Hypothetical Buyer requires any form of discount in value for non-systematic risk.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: Full text (revised version)
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    File Function: Full text (original version)
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Connecticut, Department of Economics in its series Alumni working papers with number 2013-04.

    in new window

    Length: 61 pages
    Date of creation: May 2013
    Date of revision: Sep 2014
    Handle: RePEc:uct:alumni:2013-04
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    University of Connecticut 365 Fairfield Way, Unit 1063 Storrs, CT 06269-1063

    Phone: (860) 486-4889
    Fax: (860) 486-4463
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, 09.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uct:alumni:2013-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark McConnel)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.