IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ttp/itpwps/0407.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Tax Strategy for Ontario

Author

Listed:
  • Richard M. Bird
  • Thomas A. Wilson

    () (International Tax Program, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto)

Abstract

This paper begins by comparing the 1967 Smith committee’s three volume report on Ontario taxation with the 1993 report by the Ontario Fair Tax Commission. These two very different investigations of Ontario’s tax structure, produced in two very different economic and political climates, reached surprisingly similar conclusions. Despite their distinct political origins, both reports explicitly recognized that provincial corporate taxation was (and should be) constrained by the taxation of capital in neighboring jurisdictions, and both also argued for more and better use of user charges (and benefit-based taxes). The paper asks: Has anything changed? Does Ontario need to rethink its tax policy in light of today’s circumstances? Our aim is this paper is threefold: 1) to set out the principles and realities that should govern tax policy in Ontario, 2) to provide an empirical framework with respect both to the size of the fiscal task facing the province over the next decade or so and its “fiscal competitiveness”, and 3) to suggest how best to meet the province’s fiscal needs while simultaneously removing tax barriers to competitiveness and achieving such other policy goals as the equitable sharing of the cost of government.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard M. Bird & Thomas A. Wilson, 2003. "A Tax Strategy for Ontario," International Tax Program Papers 0407, International Tax Program, Institute for International Business, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, revised Apr 2004.
  • Handle: RePEc:ttp:itpwps:0407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-2.rotman.utoronto.ca/iib/ITP0407.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.law-lib.utoronto.ca/investing/reports/rp32.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan A. Rodden & Gunnar S. Eskeland (ed.), 2003. "Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262182297, January.
    2. Richard M. Bird, 2009. "Taxing Business," World Bank Other Operational Studies 11117, The World Bank.
    3. Chun-Yan Kuo & Thomas Mcgirr & Satya Poddar, 1988. "Measuring the Non-Neutralities of Sales and Excise Taxes in Canada," Development Discussion Papers 1988-08, JDI Executive Programs.
    4. Bird, Richard, 1994. "Decentralizing infrastructure : for good or ill?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1258, The World Bank.
    5. Richard M. Bird, 2003. "Fiscal Flows, Fiscal Balance, and Fiscal Sustainability," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0302, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Enid Slack, 2005. "Easing the Fiscal Restraints: New Revenue Tools in the City of Toronto Act," International Tax Program Papers 0507, International Tax Program, Institute for International Business, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.
    2. Jack M. Mintz & Thomas A. Wilson, 2004. "Assessing Expenditure and Tax Reform Measures: A Review," International Tax Program Papers 0408, International Tax Program, Institute for International Business, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, revised Apr 2004.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ontario; tax policy; provincial taxation; local taxation;

    JEL classification:

    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ttp:itpwps:0407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Richard Bird). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/iitorca.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.