IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fiscal Stringency and Fiscal Sustainability in the American States: Panel Evidence


  • Saeid Mahdavi

    (University of Texas at San Antonio)


Unlike the federal government, most state governments in the U.S. formally operate under statutory or constitutional constraints which limit their ability to run budget deficits and resort to debt financing. A priori, one would expect to find evidence in favor of an intertemporally balanced budget, or fiscal sustainability, among states, especially those that are characterized by a high degree of fiscal stringency. We test this hypothesis in a panel of 47 contiguous states over the period 1961-2006 using four budget balance definitions and subsamples defined on the basis of whether certain balance budget requirements (BBRs) are in place. Our results, obtained from panel estimation techniques that allow for cross-state dependence, suggest that a sufficient condition for “strong” fiscal sustainability is satisfied in most cases. However, we do not find conclusive evidence that in these cases strong (weak) sustainability is due to the presence (absence) of BBRs.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeid Mahdavi, "undated". "Fiscal Stringency and Fiscal Sustainability in the American States: Panel Evidence," Working Papers 0016, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0016

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Ritter, Gunter & Gallegos, María Teresa, 2002. "Bayesian Object Identification: Variants," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 301-334, May.
    2. Leiva, Ricardo, 2007. "Linear discrimination with equicorrelated training vectors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 384-409, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Fiscal sustainability; Fiscal stringency; Balance budget rules; States budget; Public finance; Panel cointegration.;

    JEL classification:

    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eddie Salinas). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.