IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sua/ekonwp/1967.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Globalization, CSR and business legitimacy in local relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Sundström, Agneta

Abstract

The business-society relationship is commonly viewed from a legitimacy perspective and refers to how society grants power over resources needed by business for survival and success. With globalization, business's need for traditional societal legitimacy has changed, which has made the social consequences of business actions more obvious. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has emerged as a global trend, presenting various social motives and economic gains for business to voluntarily establish and maintain relationships with society. Confusion remains, as to whether corporations’ engagement in social issues is based on altruism or whether they act out of their own self-interest to increase profits. Because globalization has changed business’s need for societal legitimacy, this thesis proposes that economic motives play a central role in how businesses take social responsibility. The aim of this thesis is to investigate how globalization affects the local relationships that previously legitimated businesses, and how these changes initiate processes and responsibilities that affect both business and societal development. This thesis is based on case study research and central to the thesis is company towns with their long tradition of close socioeconomic business-society relationships, which are influenced by a new economic situation. For company towns, globalization with the ensuing reduced need of local labor has meant decreased economic motives for business to maintain local relationships. To contrast the findings regarding company towns, cooperative enterprises (CEs) cases are also looked at. For CEs, increased competition has meant increased economic motives to engage in CSR arrangements. The findings show that as long as the economic benefits of local relationships are positive, businesses engage in CSR to legitimate their business. If business economic motives and commitment to CSR cease to exist (legitimacy transformation), local relationships react passively (Paper I) and shift to philanthropic efforts and seek interests outside local community (legitimacy transition, Paper II). The more stable business and local relationships are, the easier it is for business and local stakeholders to collaborate and share experience to solve social issues (legitimacy maintenance, paper III). The more complex business economic motives are (Paper IV), the more collaborative and flexible efforts are required to take CSR (legitimacy differentiation). The findings in particular also show how business benefits from CSR collaboration since their economic resources can be directed and used more efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Sundström, Agneta, 2009. "Globalization, CSR and business legitimacy in local relationships," Department of Economics publications 1967, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sua:ekonwp:1967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pub.epsilon.slu.se/1967/
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William D. Leach & Neil W. Pelkey & Paul A. Sabatier, 2002. "Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 645-670.
    2. Halinen, Aino & Tornroos, Jan-Ake, 2005. "Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1285-1297, September.
    3. repec:eee:accfor:v:32:y:2008:i:4:p:288-302 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sua:ekonwp:1967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alejandro Engelmann). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/iesluse.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.