Adequacy of Singapore's Central Provident Fund Payouts: Income Replacement Rates of Entrant Workers
The study examines whether the Central Provident Fund (CPF) can provide adequate retirement savings for a young Singaporean joining the workforce today, using the Income Replacement Rate (IRR). The paper fills gaps in previous studies on Singapore’s IRR by incorporating unique institutional features of CPF. It also shows how IRRs vary with individuals’ decisions on their housing consumption and use of CPF savings. Assumptions used in the model are largely based on empirical data to remove subjective elements as far as possible. The study finds that CPF savings are able to support robust IRR outcomes comparable to OECD countries. Amongst entrants to the workforce today, the median male earner will be able to replace 70% of his wages when he retires. For the median female earner, the net IRR is slightly lower at 64%. If imputed rent on owner-occupied homes is taken into account, the net IRRs would be higher. For lower income earners, the Workfare Income Supplement boosts the IRRs significantly. The study affirms that for those who work consistently, the CPF system will be able to provide adequately for retirement, with prudent choice of housing and the wise use of withdrawn CPF savings.
|Date of creation:||Mar 2013|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/ecs/scape/index.html|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Giovanni Mastrobuoni & Filippo Taddei, 2011. "Age Before Beauty? Productivity and Work vs. Seniority and Early Retirement," CeRP Working Papers 120, Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin (Italy).
- Brady, Peter J., 2010. "Measuring retirement resource adequacy," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(02), pages 235-262, April.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sca:scaewp:1302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.