IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sca/scaewp/1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Cultural Revolution, Stress and Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Tilak Abeysinghe

    () (Department of Economics, National University of Singapore)

  • Jiaying Gu

    () (Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Abstract

The link between mental stress and cancer is still a belief, not a well established scientific fact. Scientists have relied largely on opinions of cancer stricken patients to establish a link between stress and cancer. Such opinion surveys tend to produce contradictory statistical inferences. Although it is difficult to conduct scientific experiments on humans similar to those on animals, human history is replete with “experiments” that have caused enormous stress on some human populations. The objective of this exercise is to draw evidence from one such massive experiment, the Cultural Revolution in China. Cancer data from Shanghai analyzed through an age-period-cohort technique show very strong evidence in support of the hypothesis that mental stress causes cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Tilak Abeysinghe & Jiaying Gu, 2010. "The Cultural Revolution, Stress and Cancer," SCAPE Policy Research Working Paper Series 1001, National University of Singapore, Department of Economics, SCAPE.
  • Handle: RePEc:sca:scaewp:1001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/ecs/pub/wp-scape/1001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. McKenzie, 2006. "Disentangling Age, Cohort and Time Effects in the Additive Model," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 68(4), pages 473-495, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sca:scaewp:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: () or (Rob Kleinsteuber). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/denussg.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.