IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Information System Development in the Small Firm: tests of contingency, agency and markets & hierarchies approaches

Listed author(s):
  • Gavin C Reid
  • Julia A Smith

This paper is designed to explore the nature of information system development in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), by appeal to three theories: contingency, agency and markets vs hierarchies. To address these theories empirically, use is made of new data which have been gathered from a sample of Scottish SMEs over a five-year period, 1994-1998. The structrue of this paper is as follows. First, the three theories under examination, contingency, agency and markets vs hierarchies, are briefly described. Second, an overview of the methodology is presented, looking at sampling, the database and summary statisics. Third, the contingency theory approach is explored on the data, both taxonomically (using cluster analysis) and inferentially (using regression analysis). Fourth, the agency approach is tested, using regression analysis. Finally, the markets vs hierarchies approach is tested, using regression analysis. The paper ends by concluding that the contingency approach is not a rival approach to the agency or markets vs hierarchies approaches, but may rather be regarded as incorporating, and supporting, elements of both.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Centre for Research into Industry, Enterprise, Finance and the Firm in its series CRIEFF Discussion Papers with number 9905.

in new window

Date of creation: Oct 1999
Handle: RePEc:san:crieff:9905
Contact details of provider: Postal:
School of Economics and Finance, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL

Phone: 01334 462420
Fax: 01334 462438
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Coase, Ronald H., 1990. "Accounting and the theory of the firm," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1-3), pages 3-13, January.
  2. Chapman, Christopher S., 1997. "Reflections on a contingent view of accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 189-205, February.
  3. Gordon, Lawrence A. & Miller, Danny, 1976. "A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 59-69, January.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:san:crieff:9905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (the School of Economics)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.