IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Hidden Deregulation of Britain's Offshore Oil Industry

Listed author(s):
  • Matthias Beck
  • Charles Woolfson

Since 1990, following Lord Cullen's public inquiry into the Piper-Alpha disaster, the oil industry has spent approximately 2.6 billion pounds on safety improvements. The operators have co-operated with governmental authorities in the design of a new regulatory regime, based on the principles of goal- setting and self-regulation. This paper attempts a preliminary assessment of this regulatory system on offshore safety. We review industry responses to successive tranches of regulation, emanating both from the HSE and the European Union, and explore the tensions which have arisen between regulator in regulated industry. Our statistical analysis indicates that there have been no significant improvements in offshore safety conditions following the establishment of the new regulatory regime; a situation which we attribute to the industry's policy of introducing an agenda of hidden deregulation into the post Piper-Alpha reconstruction of offshore regulation.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Centre for Research into Industry, Enterprise, Finance and the Firm in its series CRIEFF Discussion Papers with number 9511.

in new window

Date of creation: Oct 1995
Handle: RePEc:san:crieff:9511
Contact details of provider: Postal:
School of Economics and Finance, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL

Phone: 01334 462420
Fax: 01334 462438
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:san:crieff:9511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (the School of Economics)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.