IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Paradox of the Prescription Charge: Co-payments in British Pharmaceuticals

Listed author(s):
  • Gwendolyn C Morrison
  • W Duncan Reekie
Registered author(s):

    Prescriptions account for around 10% of UK National Health Service (NHS) expenditures. In an effort to control costs and to recoup expenditures government imposed prescription charges in 1951. Before their temporary abolition in 1965, charge income covered about 20% of costs. But both the charge and the proportion of the population exempted from paying it have increased substantially over the years. Consequently, although the charge has increased from 9% to 53% of the cost of the average script since 1978, total income from the charge has remained less than ten percent of total NHS prescription costs and consumption in the presence of other less easily controled factors such as an ageing population and unemployment. A patient co-payment such as the charge appears to be a significant determinant of health demand.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Centre for Research into Industry, Enterprise, Finance and the Firm in its series CRIEFF Discussion Papers with number 9504.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Oct 1995
    Handle: RePEc:san:crieff:9504
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    School of Economics and Finance, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL

    Phone: 01334 462420
    Fax: 01334 462438
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:san:crieff:9504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (the School of Economics)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.