IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Values, Utilities, HYEs, and QALYs

Listed author(s):
  • Gwendolyn C Morrison
Registered author(s):

    This paper demonstrates that the HYE procedure yields health status values, not utilities as its creators claim. The difference between results from HYEs and the TTO technique is merely a product of the Standard Gamble/Certainty Equivalence disparity noted elsewhere in the literature. If utility is the unit with which treatments or health profiles are to be compared, then, it is argued, a scenario specific SG should be employed. In theory, this would yield utilities without making the restrictive assumptions of utility independence between health status and the restrictive assumptions of utility independence between helath status and duration, and the linearity of utility with respect to time, which must be made with respect to QALYs.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Centre for Research into Industry, Enterprise, Finance and the Firm in its series CRIEFF Discussion Papers with number 9423.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Oct 1994
    Handle: RePEc:san:crieff:9423
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    School of Economics and Finance, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL

    Phone: 01334 462420
    Fax: 01334 462438
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:san:crieff:9423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (the School of Economics)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.