Politcal Parties and Macroeconomics: Evidence from the U.S. 1880-1948
Tests of political theories of macroeconomic policy have concentrated on the post-WW2 sample period. These theories are here tested for historical robustness using evidence from the U.S.A. from the period 1880-1948. Although no evidence is found to support the political business cycle hypothesis, there is clear evidence of differences in monetary policy between Democrat and Republican administrations. In the period of the "classical" Gold Standard (pre WW1), policy is found to be tighter under Democrats, whereas the reverse is found for the later period. There is also weaker evidence for partisan differences in output growth during the early period, but much stronger evidence for the later period. Support for the rational expectations refinement of the partisan theory is not found.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||Oct 1992|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: School of Economics and Finance, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL|
Phone: 01334 462420
Fax: 01334 462438
Web page: http://crieff.wordpress.com/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:san:crieff:9214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (the School of Economics)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.