IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/san/cdmawp/0718.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Millenium Development Goals and Sovereign Debt Write-downs

Author

Listed:
  • Sayantan Ghosal
  • Kannika Thampanishvong

    ()

Abstract

Can sovereign debt write-downs be used to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)? This paper shows that transparency of domestic governance determines how a sovereign debt write-down is structured to attain the MDGs. When domestic governance is transparent, an unconditional debt write-down enhances non-elites’ welfare. Without such transparency, conditions that directly link the debt write-down to public goods that improve non-elites’ welfare are required. In the latter case, in a dynamic setting, the debt write-down also has to be directly linked to the amount of new debt issued. Using our formal analysis, we evaluate the efficacy of the current debt relief initiatives and discuss some policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Sayantan Ghosal & Kannika Thampanishvong, 2007. "The Millenium Development Goals and Sovereign Debt Write-downs," CDMA Working Paper Series 200718, Centre for Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis.
  • Handle: RePEc:san:cdmawp:0718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~wwwecon/CDMA/papers/wp0718.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nancy Birdsall & John Williamson, 2002. "Delivering on Debt Relief: From IMF Gold to a New Aid Architecture," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 337.
    2. Jeffrey D. Sachs, 2002. "Resolving the Debt Crisis of Low-Income Countries," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 33(1), pages 257-286.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Debt Write-down; Representativeness; Transparency; Conditionality; Millennium Development Goals.;

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:san:cdmawp:0718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (the School of Economics). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/cdstauk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.