IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rcr/wpaper/02_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Efficient Versus Non-Efficient Stated Choice Designs. A Comparison In A Mode Choice Context

Author

Listed:
  • Concepción Román
  • Juan Carlos Martín
  • Raquel Espino
  • Ana Isabel Arencibia

    () (University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria)

Abstract

This paper evaluates gains in efficiency produced by the use of efficient designs to analyze stated choice (SC) data. Based on a standard experiment used in a previous research, we compare the efficiency of this design with that of the efficient design obtained according to the minimization of the D-error, considering different modelling strategies. The experiment was conducted in the context of the choice between the plane and the new high speed train in the route Madrid-Barcelona. As the levels assigned to some attributes in the stated choice exercise were customized to each respondent experience, pivoting the information provided by preliminary revealed preference questions around the reference alternative (the plane, in this case), a different efficient design was created for every respondent in the sample. Results of the analysis demonstrate that substantial gains in the significance level of the parameter estimates could have been attained if the efficient design had been used to analyze SC data.

Suggested Citation

  • Concepción Román & Juan Carlos Martín & Raquel Espino & Ana Isabel Arencibia, 2011. "Efficient Versus Non-Efficient Stated Choice Designs. A Comparison In A Mode Choice Context," Working Papers 0211, CREI Università degli Studi Roma Tre, revised 2011.
  • Handle: RePEc:rcr:wpaper:02_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://host.uniroma3.it/centri/crei/pubblicazioni/workingpapers2011/CREI_02_2011.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Stated Choice Data; Efficient Designs; Discrete Choice Models;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rcr:wpaper:02_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Francesca Vaino). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/crro3it.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.