Conceptualisation of Misunderstanding and Understanding – a phenomenographic study of students’ conceptions of allocative efficiency in Economics
It is not uncommon for lecturer to assume student understanding key concepts in her/his organisation and presentation of a topic, when these concepts, in fact, can be quite problematic for the students. This creates barriers to knowledge development in students. To overcome this barrier, it is important that we obtain students’ knowledge prior to and following instructions to inform teaching. A number of studies (Voss et al, 1986, Pong, 1999, Marton, 1988) have found that the student might have learnt a concept and utilised it in one context, but were not capable of transferring it for use in another, most notably in the context of everyday life. This raises two related questions: (1) When a student is taught an economic concept but chooses not to use it to make sense of an economic phenomenon, what is it about the economic concept that they have learnt (or mis-learnt)? (2) If the student possesses misunderstanding, how is it acquired? The paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study conducted at an Australian university, exploring the various ways commencing economics students understand the concept of allocative efficiency. In this study, written responses taken from 90 exam scripts to a structured final exam question are subject to rigorous phenomenographic analysis (Marton, 1981). Six conceptions of allocative efficiency are identified, and insights into these qualitatively different, commonly shared perceptions of this fundamental economic concept, which emerge from students’ written responses, allow us to better understand how they develop various misconceptions. The paper also discusses the implications of these findings and argues for a relational perspective of effective teaching.
|Date of creation:||20 Aug 2000|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.bus.qut.edu.au/faculty/economics/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qut:dpaper:080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angela Fletcher)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.