IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/opopre/opr0502.pdf.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring subjective social status: A case study of older Taiwanese

Author

Listed:
  • Noreen Goldman

    (Princeton University)

  • Jennifer C. Cornman

    (Polisher Research Institute, Madlyn and Leonard Abramson Center for Jewish Life)

  • Ming-Cheng Chang

    (Bureau of Health Promotion, Ministry of Health, Taiwan)

Abstract

Despite widespread use of measures of social status and increasing interest in the relationship between social status and health, variables used to denote social status are often inappropriate for older populations. This paper examines responses to a recently developed measure of subjective social position, known as the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status. The instrument asks respondents to use 10 rungs of a ladder to position themselves socioeconomically relative to other people in their country and, separately, in their community. These questions were incorporated in a recent national survey of middle-aged and older adults in Taiwan. The objective of the analysis is to gain a better understanding of how such subjective assessments are formed -- i.e., to explore the contribution of social, economic, and cultural factors in the determination of position within a social hierarchy -- and to assess the potential utility of the ladder instrument in social science and health research. Results from Taiwan are compared with those derived from subjective measures of social status in Western populations. The findings support use of this instrument as a measure of subjective social status for an older population and suggest that it may provide further insights into the social gradient in health.

Suggested Citation

  • Noreen Goldman & Jennifer C. Cornman & Ming-Cheng Chang, 2005. "Measuring subjective social status: A case study of older Taiwanese," Working Papers 289, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Office of Population Research..
  • Handle: RePEc:pri:opopre:opr0502.pdf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20150906201208/http://opr.princeton.edu/papers/opr0502.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Zudina, 2013. "Do informal workers make an underclass? An analysis of subjective social status," HSE Working papers WP BRP 24/SOC/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ladder; social gradient; social status; subjective social position; Taiwan;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification
    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:opopre:opr0502.pdf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bobray Bordelon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/opprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.