IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/20847.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is force ever justified in preventing a State from acquiring nuclear weapons?

Author

Listed:
  • Dobra, Alexandra

Abstract

In order to provide a grounded argument, the present paper asks the following questions. Why do States acquire nuclear weapons? Why do finally States tend to prevent this acquisition? What does the use of force imply? This logical structure adduces the argument sustaining the avoidance of the use of force as a viable preventive tool. It concentrates exclusively on States instituting a threat and on the force-led circumventive strategies’ implications used by non-threatening States to prevent acquisition. Through first, stressing the security model it emphasise the security-stability reasons for which countries are willing to acquire the nuclear weapon. However, secondly it punctuates the tangible side effects faced by this model. Therefore, it highlights the move towards the vicious-circle logic. Owing this vicious-circle logic, prevention must be advocated. Nonetheless, the third part evidences, via the building of my inferential model (confere Figure 1, p.8), the fact that any prevention based on the use of force must be refrained on account of its consequences - it nourishes the vicious-circle logic.

Suggested Citation

  • Dobra, Alexandra, 2010. "Is force ever justified in preventing a State from acquiring nuclear weapons?," MPRA Paper 20847, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:20847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20847/1/MPRA_paper_20847.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Force; Nuclear weapons; Prevention; Acquisition; Security model; Vicious-circle logic; Pride; Inferential Model;

    JEL classification:

    • Y40 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Dissertations - - - Dissertations
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:20847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.