IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/pjdevt/pjd_2014-2015_vol__41-42_nos__1-2g.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Domestic Resource Cost in Philippine Agriculture: Measuring Global Competitiveness of Key Commodities

Author

Listed:
  • Briones, Roehlano M.

Abstract

A well-known indicator of comparative advantage is domestic resource cost (DRC). This study provides updated estimates of DRC for major agricultural commodities in the Philippines toward evaluating competitiveness and comparative advantage as a policy guide. This study covers paddy rice, yellow maize, white maize, sugarcane, mango, coconut, milkfish, cardava banana, pineapple, hogs, and broilers. Results show that financial DRC ratio for all of the subject commodities are below unity, indicating that each activity is profitable from the private viewpoint. However, for some products, economic DRC ratio is much higher than financial DRC ratio; the distortion is mostly attributed to output price distortions. Economic DRC ratio is above unity, which means that the Philippines is not globally competitive in producing rice, hogs, and broilers. Sensitivity analysis is conducted for the main import-competing products, namely, rice, yellow maize, sugarcane, broilers, and hog; the sensitivity results confirm the robustness of the findings. The competitiveness analysis places the current policy framework into question. Comparative costs of rice, broilers, and hogs are currently at high levels. It is unrealistic to expect market and technology conditions to change drastically enough to make these products competitive (except perhaps for hogs). Given the large penalty of protection to consumers, and the fiscal burden of production support, it is appropriate to scale back on self-sufficiency targets for these uncompetitive products. For yellow maize and sugarcane, market conditions and technology have evolved to the point where these sectors are now globally competitive. Again, liberalization is highly appropriate, especially on the export side. There should also be greater emphasis on processing and logistics in order for the supply chain to maximize benefit from the farmers’ comparative advantage. Public goods for competitive crops, such as public research and development centers (which are historically underfunded or missing altogether), extension systems, and infrastructure, remain promising opportunities for government investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Briones, Roehlano M., 2016. "Domestic Resource Cost in Philippine Agriculture: Measuring Global Competitiveness of Key Commodities," Philippine Journal of Development PJD 2014-2015 Vol. 41-42 , Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:pjdevt:pjd_2014-2015_vol__41-42_nos__1-2g
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://serp-p.pids.gov.ph/serp-p/download.php?d=5776&s=3
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bautista, Romeo M., 2003. "Exchange Rate Policy in Philippine Development," Research Paper Series RPS 2003-01, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    2. Herdt, Robert W. & Lacsina, Teresa A., 1976. "The Domestic Resource Cost of Increasing Philippine Rice Production," Food Research Institute Studies, Stanford University, Food Research Institute, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20.
    3. Costales, Achilles & Delgado, Christopher L. & Catelo, Maria Angeles & Lapar, Ma. Lucila & Tiongco, Marites & Ehui, Simeon K. & Bautista, Anne Zillah, 2007. "Scale and access issues affecting smallholder hog producers in an expanding peri-urban market: Southern Luzon, Philippines," Research reports 151, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Briones, Roehlano M. & David, Cristina C. & Inocencio, Arlene B. & Intal, Ponciano Jr. S. & Geron, Maria Piedad S. & Ballesteros, Marife M., 2012. "Monitoring and Evaluation of Agricultural Policy Indicators," Discussion Papers DP 2012-26, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roehlano M. Briones, 2014. "Estimates of Domestic Resource Cost in Philippines Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 20070, The World Bank Group.
    2. Briones, Roehlano M., 2015. "Small Farmers in High-Value Chains: Binding or Relaxing Constraints to Inclusive Growth?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 43-52.
    3. Briones, Roehlano M., 2013. "Impact Assessment of the Agricultural Production Support Services of the Department of Agriculture on the Income of Poor Farmers/Fisherfolk: Review of the Evidence," Discussion Papers DP 2013-23, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    4. Lapiña, Geny F. & Catelo, Salvador P., 2017. "Knowledge and Information Gaps: Implications for Philippine Food Security," Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development, Journal of Economics, Management & Agricultural Development (JEMAD), vol. 3(2), December.
    5. Braja Bandhu Swain & Nils Teufel, 2017. "The impact of urbanisation on crop–livestock farming system: a comparative case study of India and Bangladesh," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 19(1), pages 161-180, April.
    6. Narrod, Clare A. & Pray, Carl E. & Tiongco, Marites, 2008. "Technology transfer, policies, and the role of the private sector in the global poultry revolution:," IFPRI discussion papers 841, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Lubungu, Mary & Chapoto, Antony & Tembo, Gelson, 2012. "Smallholder Farmers Participation in Livestock Markets: The Case of Zambian Farmers," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 140902, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    8. Juarez, Fleurdeliz S., 1985. "The Private and Social Profitability of Mechanical Threshing," Philippine Journal of Development JPD 1985 Vol. XII No. 1-e, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    9. David, Cristina C. & Inocencio, Arlene B., 1995. "Comparative and Competitive Advantage of Philippine Rice Production: 1966-1990," Discussion Papers DP 1995-03, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    10. Wang, Qingbin & Zhang, Guangxuan, 2012. "China’s small-scale hog production and implications for trade: Evidence from a farmer survey," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 125288, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Manasan, Rosario G., 2013. "Analysis of the President`s Budget for 2013," Discussion Papers DP 2013-31, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    12. Rosario G. Manasan, 2013. "Analysis of the President's Budget for 2013," Working Papers id:5391, eSocialSciences.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:pjdevt:pjd_2014-2015_vol__41-42_nos__1-2g. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.