A Plea for Errors
This paper argues that all historical data series should be accompanied by formal estimates of their margins of error. We discuss the nature of errors in data series and review earlier attempts to assess their reliability. We show how overall margins of error may be calculated for historical series from judgments on the reliability of their components, and how these allow readers both to appraise the estimate and to test the implications of applying different standards. An illustration is provided for Hoffmann’s index of British industrial output, 1770–1831. The calculations emphasize the value of this approach to the recent debate on growth rates during the industrial revolution and suggest its merits more generally.
|Date of creation:||01 Jul 2001|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/economics/|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- C. K. Harley & N. F. R. Crafts, 1995.
"Cotton textiles and industrial output growth during the industrial revolution,"
Economic History Review,
Economic History Society, vol. 48(1), pages 134-144, 02.
- Harley, C.K. & Crafts, N.F.R., 1994. "Cotton Textiles and Industrial Output Growth During the Industrial revolution," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 420, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
- Simon Kuznets & Lillian Epstein & Elizabeth Jenks, 1941.
"National Income and Its Composition, 1919-1938, Volume I,"
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number kuzn41-1, Enero.
- Simon Kuznets & Lillian Epstein & Elizabeth Jenks, 1946. "National Income and Its Composition, 1919-1938, Volume II," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number kuzn41-3, Enero.
- N. F. R. Crafts & C. K. Harley, 1992. "Output growth and the British industrial revolution: a restatement of the Crafts-Harley view," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 45(4), pages 703-730, November.
- Thomas J. Weiss, 1992. "U. S. Labor Force Estimates and Economic Growth, 1800-1860," NBER Chapters, in: American Economic Growth and Standards of Living before the Civil War, pages 19-78 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- N/A, 1984. "The Three Measures of GDP," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 107(1), pages 54-59, February.
- Greasley David & Oxley Les, 1995. "Balanced versus Compromise Estimates of UK GDP 1870-1913," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 262-272, April.
- Richard Stone & D. G. Champernowne & J. E. Meade, 1942. "The Precision of National Income Estimates," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 111-125.
- Javier Cuenca Esteban, 1994. "British textile prices, 1770-1831: are British growth rates worth revising once again?," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 47(1), pages 66-105, 02.
- Temin, Peter, 1997. "Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(01), pages 63-82, March.
- Federico, Giovanni & Tena, Antonio, 1991. "On the accuracy of foreign trade statistics (1909-1935): Morgenstern revisited," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 259-273, July.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nuf:esohwp:_041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maxine Collett)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.