IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels – Report 2010

  • Claude Mathys


    (National Bank of Belgium, Microeconomic Information Department)

Registered author(s):

    This paper is an annual publication issued by the Microeconomic Analysis service of the National Bank of Belgium. The Flemish maritime ports (Antwerp, Ghent, Ostend, Zeebrugge), the Autonomous Port of Liège and the port of Brussels play a major role in their respective regional economies and in the Belgian economy, not only in terms of industrial activity but also as intermodal centers facilitating the commodity flow. This update paper1 provides an extensive overview of the economic importance and development of the Flemish maritime ports, the Liège port complex and the port of Brussels for the period 2005 - 2010, with an emphasis on 2010. Focusing on the three major variables of value added, employment and investment, the report also provides some information based on the social balance and an overview of the financial situation in these ports as a whole. These observations are linked to a more general context, along with a few cargo statistics. Annual accounts data from the Central Balance Sheet Office were used for the calculation of direct effects, the study of financial ratios and the analysis of the social balance sheet. The indirect effects of the activities concerned were estimated in terms of value added and employment, on the basis of data from the National Accounts Institute. (...) After the decline seen in 2009, maritime cargo traffic in the Flemish ports reversed the trend and recorded a rise in 2010. Direct value added increased in each of the four ports in Flanders. Both maritime and non-maritime branches as a whole are up. The only decrease in value added occurred in the maritime branches in the port of Ostend and the non-maritime branches of the port of Zeebrugge. Of the six ports, the port of Brussels recorded the strongest growth rate for value added in the maritime cluster, and the port of Ostend recorded the strongest increase in the non-maritime cluster. Direct employment in the Flemish ports as a whole declined during the year 2010. This is true of both the maritime and non-maritime cluster. Except for Zeebrugge, investment decreased in all the Flemish ports. The decline in investment was around 17 percent in the ports of Antwerp, Ghent and Ostend, whereas Zeebrugge recorded a growth rate of more than four-fifths in its investment levels in 2010. The volume of cargo handled in the port of Liège increased in 2010. Direct value added rose slightly, whereas employment registered a significant decline. There were job losses in both maritime and nonmaritime branches. In the non-maritime cluster, investment diminished substantially because of a lack of projects. The volume of cargo handled at the port of Brussels rose in 2010. Both value added and employment increased in maritime branches. Value added in non-maritime branches remained steady but employment contracted. The downturn in investment recorded during 2009 continued throughout 2010. This report provides a comprehensive account of these issues, giving details for each economic sector, although the comments are confined to the main changes that occurred in 2010.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by National Bank of Belgium in its series Working Paper Document with number 225.

    in new window

    Length: 97 pages
    Date of creation: Jul 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:nbb:docwpp:201207-17
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Boulevard de Berlaimont 14, B-1000 Bruxelles
    Phone: (+ 32) (0) 2 221 25 34
    Fax: (+ 32) (0) 2 221 31 62
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbb:docwpp:201207-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.