IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ageing and health care: inexorable costs versus modest adaptation


  • Jeff Richardson

    () (Centre for Health Economics, Monash University)


This “Working Paper” consists of two documents. The first is a submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry “Implications of an Ageing Australia”. The second is a Research Note “Why Ageing is Unlikely to be a Problem for the Health Sector”. This was the key document submitted to the Productivity Commission. Its abstract is as follows: This note summarises and elaborates some of the results obtained by Richardson and Robertson (1999). It focuses upon an issue which many still find paradoxical, viz, that while older people spend much more upon health than younger people, this does not imply that health expenditures in the next half century will necessarily become a major problem. The reason for this is two-fold. Firstly, there is no necessary relationship between cross sectional and time series data. Secondly, any effect which might arise from ageing per se will be quantitatively small in relation to GDP growth. An important caveat is that ageing may accentuate the cost impact of new technologies in the health sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeff Richardson, 2004. "Ageing and health care: inexorable costs versus modest adaptation," Centre for Health Economics Working Papers 150/04, Monash University, Centre for Health Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:mhe:chewps:2004-150

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Ried, Walter, 2007. "On the relationship between aging, edical progress and age-specific health care expenditures," Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere 08/2007, University of Greifswald, Faculty of Law and Economics.
    2. Ried, Walter, 2006. "Demographischer Wandel, medizinischer Fortschritt und Ausgaben für Gesundheitsleistungen: eine theoretische Analyse," Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere 09/2006, University of Greifswald, Faculty of Law and Economics.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mhe:chewps:2004-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Teresa Cheong). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.